so...
The Dark Knight wasn't a disappointment. that's a shock because my expectations were huge. i mean huge. and i am happy to say that heath ledger left us with a performance that was memorable. i know he's in terry gilliam's new flick too, but this is probably the role he'll be remembered for. it's not an award-winning performance, but neither was jack's rendering of the joker twenty-plus years ago.
the boards at IMDB are all abuzz about whether he should get the oscar for best actor or best supporting actor. apparently someone forgot just how pretentious movie people are, especially those fuckers at
The Academy. but honestly people, LOTR ROTK was a fluke. no one ever wins real, serious awards for flicks like this. and peter jackson was the exception that proves that rule. sorry to burst bubbles and whatnot, but it isn't happening. if he didn't win for
Brokeback Mountain it isn't happening. end of story.
surprisingly, the reality of how amazing heath ledger was didn't really hit me until i saw that flick today. that's strange, because his performance in
Candy was better. by the way, if you haven't seen
Candy make the time and effort. ledger was amazing in it as well as his costar abby cornish (she's australian too, and absolutely gorgeous). but anyway,
The Dark Knight was amazing.
furthermore, i love that christopher nolan made this flick. he's so good at blurring the lines between hero and anti-hero. of course at the end of the day the villain is the villain, but nolan keeps it interesting by not taking the cheesy route that would have been so easy to take with a hero like batman.
i also enjoyed maggie gyllenhall in it. i always enjoy her performances. she's so... well, i'm not sure what it is about her, but she's definitely a vast improvement over katie holmes. now if we can just get rid of christian bale for the next sequel we'll be in good shape. i know i'll catch hell for that last comment, but i really can't stand him. ever since
American Psycho i just can't stand him.
finally, i'll leave you with my wishful thinking for the third installment of the latest incarnation of the batman series on celluloid. number one, and this is a higher priority than getting rid of christian bale, is cillian murphy. this guy's an amazing actor. remember
28 Days Later anyone? this dude would make an awesome nemesis. i'm not really familiar with the whole comic story so i dunno if it fits with anything that's already been done, but it seems like scarecrow was a major character in one of the episodes from the 90's. anyway, i believe cillian murphy would really thrive as a villain under nolan's direction. the only other real wish i have is to get rid of chrisitan bale. how about edward norton or guy pearce. hell, i think clive owen would even be a good candidate. other than that, i think the casting has been excellent and i'm looking forward to the next installment.
so get to the movies people. and get on netflix and order
Candy. you won't be disappointed. hope you're all enjoying the weekend. take care of yourselves

ajm
---